Well, I never said I wanted to define a corpus by this criterion. It was
just an observation on what makes some corpora distinct from archives.
> Isn't it perhaps better to think of a corpus as a just collection of texts,
> no more and no less?
I would still want to stick to my point that it's a purposeful collection,
with linguistic criteria in mind, not any old collection of random textual
Have a good weekend everybody,
-- //\\ computer officer | corpus research | department of english | school of - //\\ humanities | university of birmingham | edgbaston | birmingham b15 2tt - \\// united kingdom | phone +44-(0)121-414-6206 | fax +44-(0)121-414-5668/\ - \\// mobile 07050 104504 | http://www-clg.bham.ac.uk | firstname.lastname@example.org\/ -